In 2013 patient engagement is a hot topic in the field of
health IT. Within this conversation one of the terms which is often used to
describe the technological challenges involved in creating a digital doctor-patient
relationship is the “Human Touch”. This concept reflects to all of the warm and
fuzzy intangibles of humanity: care; intuition; instinct; etc.
When discussing health IT, or any other technology, the term
"human touch" can be a very harmful term. The main reason for this is
the insistence on the use of the word "human" which leads to heated
debates as to the ability of automated processes or machines to provide a
"human" element.
This debate quickly moves into a highly philosophical realm
which can only be resolved by performing a Turing test.
The "human touch" is a means to an end.
When discussing engagement and communications technologies
the outcome sought by adding an element of the "human touch" is
actually the delivery of relevant, interesting, and personalized content which
will drive patient engagement.
Using this definition we can now bypass the philosophical
debate and engage in a conversation on the practical and the technical merits
of creating such a system.
Technologically, it is possible to develop communications
systems which respond to patient data both demographic and medical and use the
information known about a patient to select the most appropriate content to
deliver. These systems can deliver localized messages, discussing issues and
conditions relevant to the patient, and can even alter the tone of the
conversation based on the patient's responsiveness.
Moving into the digital health age, a focus needs to be
placed on creating digital patient engagement without the need to involve the
practitioner or his staff except at key points (such as regular check-ups or
events requiring a doctor's attention). As such there is a need to
fundamentally revise the 5 pillars of patient engagement described in the
article.
Rather than focusing on engaging patients by "showing
you care" patient engagement must focus on ensuring that the messages the
patient receive are highly targeted, highly individual and provide the patient
with practical benefit. The doctor in this equation should be more "hands
off", while the patient should be assuming most of the "hands
on" responsibility.
As health technology evolves it will be important to
consider engagement as a practical function of any patient-facing system.
Digital engagement technologies should be incorporated into the design of the
systems to ensure continued patient participation and to enable the systems to
achieve practical patient outcomes over the long term.
By leaving the “human touch” to the healthcare
practitioners, health technologists can focus on developing automated systems to
generate digital responses. By doing this, the goals of healthcare technology
can focus on improving patient engagement and delivering value to both patient
and practitioner.
No comments:
Post a Comment